top of page

Why Shedeur Sanders Is Still Waiting: A Deep Dive into the 2025 NFL Draft Slide





The Unexpected Slide


Shedeur Sanders, the talented quarterback from Colorado and son of NFL legend Deion Sanders, was widely projected as a first-round pick in the 2025 NFL Draft.

His impressive college stats—over 3,000 passing yards and 27 touchdowns in his final season—positioned him as a top prospect.

Yet, as the draft unfolded, Sanders remained unselected through the first three rounds, a surprising development that left many analysts and fans puzzled.


Quarterbacks Drafted Ahead of Sanders


Five quarterbacks were chosen before Sanders:


  1. Cam Ward – Miami (No. 1 overall): Strong arm and mobility.

  2. Jaxson Dart – New York Giants (No. 25): Leadership and accuracy.

  3. Tyler Shough – New Orleans Saints (No. 40): Experience across multiple college programs.

  4. Jalen Milroe – Seattle Seahawks (No. 92): Raw athleticism and dual-threat capability.

  5. Dillon Gabriel – Cleveland Browns (No. 94): Record-setting college production and high football IQ.


Factors Contributing to Sanders’ Draft Position



Several factors contributed to teams passing on Shedeur Sanders:


  • Perceived Overconfidence:


    Some teams labeled Sanders as “entitled” during interviews, mistaking his confidence for arrogance.

  • Father’s Influence:


    Deion Sanders’ larger-than-life presence created concern. Some front offices worried that drafting Shedeur meant also dealing with Deion’s voice — a strong, unapologetic advocate for his son.

  • On-Field Concerns:


    Scouts critiqued Sanders’ tendency to hold the ball too long under pressure and questioned how well he’d adapt to NFL-level defenses.

  • Team Needs and Fit:


    Some teams simply preferred quarterbacks who better fit their offensive schemes or team culture.


The Deeper, Unspoken Reason: America’s Fear of Strong Black Fatherhood



Let’s speak truth: having a positive Black father weighed into Shedeur’s slide — heavily.


  • When a Black father, especially one as visible as Deion Sanders, proudly, vocally, and unapologetically champions his son, it challenges a deep-rooted narrative that the system is used to.

  • Many institutions — including the NFL — are still more comfortable with the story of the absent Black father than the present, powerful one.

  • America expects Black athletes to be grateful, humble, and quiet — not to walk into a room with the full backing of legacy, love, and self-worth.

  • Shedeur didn’t just bring talent into those interviews; he brought generations of pride, power, and presence. Some front offices translated that as a “control problem” rather than a “leadership asset.”



In short:


The NFL isn’t just drafting players. They’re drafting narratives.

And Shedeur’s narrative — a loved, confident, well-coached Black son — scared them.


Looking Ahead


Shedeur Sanders’ slide doesn’t erase his talent — it only sets up a bigger story.

A team will eventually bet on him.

And when they do, they won’t just be getting a quarterback — they’ll be getting a movement.


Because Shedeur represents the future of what young Black athletes — and Black families — look like:

Confident. Prepared. Proud. Unapologetic.




Stay tuned. This story isn’t over — it’s just getting started.


Comments


USA, Atlanta, Georgia

Comparing a 401(k) Investment vs. Christine’s Heart $30K Program

Both investment strategies aim to grow wealth over time, but they differ in structure, returns, and accessibility. Let's break them down.

1. 401(k) Investment (Traditional Approach)

Scenario: Maxing out a 401(k) with a 6% employer match for 20 years.

  • Initial Investment: $23,000 per year (plus a $6,000 employer match)

  • Total Contributions: ~$580,000 over 20 years

  • Assumed Growth Rate: 8% annually (market average)

  • End Balance: $1,433,265

  • Liquidity: Limited (penalties for early withdrawals)

  • Risk: Moderate (market fluctuations but long-term growth)

  • Taxation: Tax-deferred (taxed upon withdrawal in retirement)

2. Christine’s Heart $30K Program (High-Growth Alternative)

Investing $30,000 with Christine’s Heart for accelerated returns.

  • Initial Investment: $30,000

  • Timeframe: 12 months

  • Projected Growth: $100,000+ potential return

  • End Balance (After 20 Years of Reinvesting Profits): Significantly higher potential

  • Liquidity: Higher (faster access to funds)

  • Risk: Higher (active investing, market knowledge required)

  • Taxation: Depending on structure, profits may be taxable each year

Which One is Better?

  • 401(k) is best for long-term, stable growth with employer matching and tax benefits.

  • Christine’s Heart is best for those seeking faster returns with the ability to reinvest profits multiple times over a 20-year period.

If someone starts with $30K in Christine’s Heart and reinvests profits wisely, they could reach seven figures much faster than a 401(k)—but with greater involvement and risk management.

Comparing a 401(k) vs. Christine’s Heart $30K Program (12-Month Cycle) 1. 401(k) Investment (Traditional Approach) Annual Contribution: $23,000 (plus $6,000 employer match) Total Contributions Over 20 Years: ~$580,000 Assumed Growth Rate: 8% annually (market average) End Balance (After 20 Years): $1,433,265 Liquidity: Low (penalties for early withdrawals) Risk: Moderate (market fluctuations but long-term growth) 2. Christine’s Heart $30K Program (12-Month Cycle) Initial Investment: $30,000 Timeframe Per Cycle: 12 months Projected Growth: $100,000 per year Reinvesting Profits: Compounding over 20 years Liquidity: High (cash available yearly) Risk: Higher (active management required) Projected Growth Over 20 Years (Reinvesting Profits Yearly) If the $30,000 grows to $100,000 in one year and the full amount is reinvested each cycle: Using the formula for compound interest: 𝐹𝑉=𝑃(1+𝑟)𝑛 FV=P(1+r) n where: P = $30,000 (Initial investment) r = 233% return per year (since $30K → $100K) n = 20 years Let’s calculate the final value. After only 10 years of reinvesting profits in Christine’s Heart $30K program (with a projected $100K return per year), the potential balance could grow to well over $4.1 million—a massive theoretical number driven by high annual compounding. Key Takeaways: Christine’s Heart offers much faster wealth accumulation, assuming consistent performance. A 401(k) is safer but slower, growing to $1.43 million over the same period. Christine’s Heart has higher risk but far greater liquidity, allowing access to funds yearly. In reality, market fluctuations, taxes, and reinvestment strategies would impact actual results, but the difference in potential returns is clear.

Stay in the Loop

Mahalo

blu porsche

blu porsche

bottom of page