top of page

The Art of the Deal vs. The Rules of the Table: Trump Meets The Marquis

Sometimes life imitates art. And sometimes, art looks like it got a spray tan, put on a red tie, and started issuing High Table decrees from a golden escalator.


Let me introduce you to the match-up you didn’t know you needed: Donald J. Trump vs. the Marquis Vincent de Gramont — John Wick 4’s villain, French-accented power snob, and master of bureaucracy with blood on his cufflinks.


They don’t look alike. One wears Brioni suits; the other, tailored desperation. But beneath the surface? Same game. Different continents.




The Hair, The Ego, The Delusion


First of all — the hair. Both are walking monuments to ego. The Marquis’s slicked-back mane says, “I own the room.” Trump’s golden crown whispers, “I am the room.” Neither accepts a single wrinkle or strand out of place. Why? Because image is power.


The Marquis kills people who break tradition. Trump fires them on Twitter.


Same energy.




High Table vs. Deep State


The Marquis represents the High Table — the elite, untouchable upper crust that sets the rules and punishes anyone who questions them. Sound familiar?


Trump didn’t want to destroy the system — he wanted to run it. He walked into the Oval Office and treated it like the Continental lobby. Diplomacy? Nah. More like “You’re fired, Secretary.” The High Table in John Wick keeps order through fear and contracts. Trump tried to keep order through tweets and chaos.


Both obsessed with loyalty. Both allergic to accountability.




Weapons of Choice: Pistols vs Platforms


The Marquis plays 4D chess with assassins. He turns best friends into enemies with the flick of a checkbook. Trump? He didn’t need bullets — he had Fox News, Truth Social, and a loyal base that treated every “witch hunt” like a war cry.


The Marquis destroyed sacred grounds to make a point.


Trump metaphorically did the same — with executive orders, press conferences, and golf rounds mid-crisis.




Public Image: Cult Leader Vibes


People don’t follow these men because they have to. They follow because they’re caught up in the show. The drama. The aura.


The Marquis walks into a room with violins playing and chandeliers trembling. Trump enters with “God Bless the U.S.A.” and a crowd of people wearing merch with his name on it.


And yet both have the same fatal flaw: they believe they’re untouchable.




Final Duel: The Mirror Cracks


At the end of John Wick 4, the Marquis gets clever. He lets someone else fight his battle, thinking he can swoop in for the glory. But John? John always has one more bullet.


Trump too has let others fight his wars — lawyers, loyalists, even family. But in the end, when the courtroom lights go on or the indictments hit the fan — you find out if the armor was real… or just made of gold paint and borrowed time.




Conclusion: A Toast to the Table


So here we are. Two men, one fiction, one very real, both obsessed with power, loyalty, and looking flawless while the world burns behind them. Trump is America’s Marquis — dramatic, divisive, dangerous in a tux.


The only difference?


John Wick always finishes the job.


This is King, signing off with one eye on the High Table and the other on the headlines. Because fiction ain’t that far from fact anymore.





Comments


USA, Atlanta, Georgia

Comparing a 401(k) Investment vs. Christine’s Heart $30K Program

Both investment strategies aim to grow wealth over time, but they differ in structure, returns, and accessibility. Let's break them down.

1. 401(k) Investment (Traditional Approach)

Scenario: Maxing out a 401(k) with a 6% employer match for 20 years.

  • Initial Investment: $23,000 per year (plus a $6,000 employer match)

  • Total Contributions: ~$580,000 over 20 years

  • Assumed Growth Rate: 8% annually (market average)

  • End Balance: $1,433,265

  • Liquidity: Limited (penalties for early withdrawals)

  • Risk: Moderate (market fluctuations but long-term growth)

  • Taxation: Tax-deferred (taxed upon withdrawal in retirement)

2. Christine’s Heart $30K Program (High-Growth Alternative)

Investing $30,000 with Christine’s Heart for accelerated returns.

  • Initial Investment: $30,000

  • Timeframe: 12 months

  • Projected Growth: $100,000+ potential return

  • End Balance (After 20 Years of Reinvesting Profits): Significantly higher potential

  • Liquidity: Higher (faster access to funds)

  • Risk: Higher (active investing, market knowledge required)

  • Taxation: Depending on structure, profits may be taxable each year

Which One is Better?

  • 401(k) is best for long-term, stable growth with employer matching and tax benefits.

  • Christine’s Heart is best for those seeking faster returns with the ability to reinvest profits multiple times over a 20-year period.

If someone starts with $30K in Christine’s Heart and reinvests profits wisely, they could reach seven figures much faster than a 401(k)—but with greater involvement and risk management.

Comparing a 401(k) vs. Christine’s Heart $30K Program (12-Month Cycle) 1. 401(k) Investment (Traditional Approach) Annual Contribution: $23,000 (plus $6,000 employer match) Total Contributions Over 20 Years: ~$580,000 Assumed Growth Rate: 8% annually (market average) End Balance (After 20 Years): $1,433,265 Liquidity: Low (penalties for early withdrawals) Risk: Moderate (market fluctuations but long-term growth) 2. Christine’s Heart $30K Program (12-Month Cycle) Initial Investment: $30,000 Timeframe Per Cycle: 12 months Projected Growth: $100,000 per year Reinvesting Profits: Compounding over 20 years Liquidity: High (cash available yearly) Risk: Higher (active management required) Projected Growth Over 20 Years (Reinvesting Profits Yearly) If the $30,000 grows to $100,000 in one year and the full amount is reinvested each cycle: Using the formula for compound interest: 𝐹𝑉=𝑃(1+𝑟)𝑛 FV=P(1+r) n where: P = $30,000 (Initial investment) r = 233% return per year (since $30K → $100K) n = 20 years Let’s calculate the final value. After only 10 years of reinvesting profits in Christine’s Heart $30K program (with a projected $100K return per year), the potential balance could grow to well over $4.1 million—a massive theoretical number driven by high annual compounding. Key Takeaways: Christine’s Heart offers much faster wealth accumulation, assuming consistent performance. A 401(k) is safer but slower, growing to $1.43 million over the same period. Christine’s Heart has higher risk but far greater liquidity, allowing access to funds yearly. In reality, market fluctuations, taxes, and reinvestment strategies would impact actual results, but the difference in potential returns is clear.

Stay in the Loop

Mahalo

blu porsche

blu porsche

Play Video
bottom of page